| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Georg Bruns Administrative Moderator
Joined: 28 Jun 2006 Posts: 995
|
Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 2:38 pm Post subject: Cubase 4 FAQ |
|
|
CUBASE 4 FAQ
1. Can I install Cubase 4 next to existing Cubase installations?
Yes, you can. Different Cubase versions won't harm each other as long as each installation gets its own directory (PC) resp. application name (Mac).
By default an additional Cubase 4 installation will be named "Cubase 4".
2. Will Cubase 4 be compatible to previous Cubase versions? Can I share Cubase 4 project files with users of previous versions?
No, project files created by the current version of Cubase 4 (4.0) cannot be read by previous Cubase releases.
3. Is Cubase 4 demanding a faster CPU?
No. If you're running a Cubase SX 3 project in Cubase 4 you won't notice any differences regarding the CPU charge. This is why the stated system requirements for both products are almost the same. Of course some of the 33 new high-quality VST effects will be more demanding than their resembling predecessors.
4. Has the audio engine of Cubase 4 been changed?
No, Cubase 4 is handling audio in the same established way Cubase SX 3 does. (Only if you consider VST3 as a part of the "audio engine" you could say it has been changed in the broadest sense of the word. Either way the quality of audio processing is not affected at all.)
5. What are the main benefits of VST3? Is it fully compatible to VST 2 plugs?
This Knowledge Base article will kindly answer all your VST3 related questions in detail: => Information about VST3 in Cubase
6. Is Side Chaining finally available? Could the Group Channel routing limitations be conquered?
Yes, both has been introduced with Cubase 4.1
7. Any "Known Issues"?
"Known Issues" are listed in the document "Issues & Solutions" that can be found on the Cubase 4 installation disc.
As usual updated "Issues & Solutions" lists will come with according update patches.
8. Can I place the Cubase 4 upgrade licence on my Steinberg Key holding the Cubase SX license or do I get another dongle?
When you upgrade to Cubase 4 the Cubase SX3 licence will be "upgraded" to a Cubase 4 licence. All Cubase 4 licenses include licenses for Cubase SX 1, 2 and 3. More FAQ regarding the Steinberg Key can be found in the Knowledge Base article => Steinberg Key - Details, tipps and troubleshooting.
9. Will Cubase SE 3 be updated, too?
Yes, there will be a "future" for Cubase SE 3. The previous product lines were Cubase SE, SL and SX. Cubase SL 3 became Cubase Studio 4 and Cubase SX 3 has been replaced by Cubase 4. So now it's Cubase SE's turn. When? Sorry, we tell you as soon as we know.
10. What about remote controls? Will they be supported from start, or will I have to wait until the respective companies release new drivers?
The following remote controls are in the package: CM Motormix, Generic Remote, JL Cooper CS-10, JLCooper MCS-3000, Mackie Baby HUI, Mackie Control, Radikal SAC-2k, ROLAND MCR8, Steinberg Housten, TASCAM DM-24(HUI), TASCAM US-428, Yamaha 01v, Yamaha 01v96v2, Yamaha 01x, Yamaha 02r96v2, Yamaha DM 1000v2, Yamaha DM 2000v2, Yamaha Dm2000. The most other templates for other devices can still be used with Cubase 4. Please understand that they are not tested with Cubase 4 / Cubase Studio 4 !
11. Is the HALionOne sound set expandable? Can HALionOne import other formats?
HALionOne only accepts HSB files which have been exclusively created for it, which is currently only the content delivered with Cubase 4 or Cubase Studio 4. HALionOne HSB files can be only used inside HALionOne, not in other HSB format supporting products, such as HALion3. Expandibility is given in a form that we could of course create additional HSB banks to be used with HALionOne for future updates. Opening HALionOne to generally accept all sorts of HSB content could be possible as well for the future, but is not yet planned.
12. Can I install Cubase 4 or Cubase Studio 4 on a Windows 2000 machine?
No, Cubase 4 and Cubase Studio 4 cannot be installed on a Windows 2000 machine. The installer will deny the installation. The minimum requirement is Windows XP Service Pack 1. Recommended is Service Pack 2.
13. Can I install Cubase 4 or Cubase Studio 4 on a Mac system with no OS X 10.4 (Tiger) installed?
No, Mac OS X 10.4 is the minimum requirement. The installer does not allow installations on a previous Mac OS version.
14. Why should I update to Cubase 4?
You will find some answers by users in => this thread.
Of course there are information on the new features on the => Cubase 4 product site.
Further questions might be answered in the general => Cubase 4 announcement that is located right above this sticky in the topic list of this forum. _________________ www.steinberg.net
Last edited by Georg Bruns on Wed Jul 11, 2007 2:53 pm; edited 5 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kitchen Sink Grand Senior Member
Joined: 09 Jan 2005 Posts: 4336
|
Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 11:15 am Post subject: Re: Cubase 4 FAQ |
|
|
| Georg Bruns wrote: |
1. Can I install Cubase 4 next to existing Cubase installations?
Yes, you can. As long as each installation gets its own directory different Cubase versions won't harm each other.
|
Christian said there will be a difference in "parallel version" license compatibility. With the current Cubase SX3 license it has been possible to install and run "little brother" versions like Cubase SE, but this won't be possible after upgrading the license on the USB dongle ("Steinberg Key") to Cubase 4. Is this correct?
This is a little bit of a feature down-grade. I won't be able to get all my friends to upgrade to version 4, and there won't be a version 4 "SE" available for awhile. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Basjoe Junior Member
Joined: 13 Aug 2005 Posts: 40 Location: Chesterfield, UK
|
Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2006 3:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Please indicate whether support for the Yamaha DSP factory has been dropped. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Eddie Macarthur Member
Joined: 06 Jan 2005 Posts: 981 Location: Glasgow, Scotland, UK
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jeffmac New Member
Joined: 26 Sep 2006 Posts: 4
|
Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2006 11:27 pm Post subject: Activating/Deactivating Busses |
|
|
hi
Activating/Deactivating Busses works for vst2 plugins? Or is this only a vst3 plugin feature?
Cheers _________________ BOOOMBLAST |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Georg Bruns Administrative Moderator
Joined: 28 Jun 2006 Posts: 995
|
Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2006 10:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Eddie Macarthur wrote: | the manual seems to say that halion one can import other halion libraries (like halion se can do).
is this the case? |
No, HALionOne only reads its own HSB files. The according manual passage might be a bit mistakable. I'll verify that.
Cheers,
Georg _________________ www.steinberg.net |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Georg Bruns Administrative Moderator
Joined: 28 Jun 2006 Posts: 995
|
Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2006 10:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Basjoe wrote: | | Please indicate whether support for the Yamaha DSP factory has been dropped. |
We'll expect to get a definitive answer very soon!
Hold on, please... _________________ www.steinberg.net |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Christian Dettner Grand Senior Member
Joined: 01 Dec 2004 Posts: 3395 Location: Hamburg, Germany
|
Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2006 2:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The FAQ above has been updated in regards to HALionOne and supported OS systems. _________________ Steinberg Media Technologies GmbH |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mhelin Member
Joined: 28 Jan 2005 Posts: 104
|
Posted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 4:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | 12. Can I install Cubase 4 or Cubase Studio 4 on a Windows 2000 machine?
You can not install Cubase 4 or Cubase Studio 4 on a Windows 2000 machine. The installer will deny the installation. We also do not allow installation on Windows XP when not at least(!) Service Pack 1 is installed. So, minimum requirement: Windows XP SP1. Recommend, especially when a new OS installation is planned, is to have Windows XP SP2 installed.
|
Why not on Win 2k? Is there some technical reason or is it just politics? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Christian Dettner Grand Senior Member
Joined: 01 Dec 2004 Posts: 3395 Location: Hamburg, Germany
|
Posted: Thu Sep 28, 2006 5:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Both is true. _________________ Steinberg Media Technologies GmbH |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Waywyn Member
Joined: 31 Jan 2005 Posts: 371 Location: Hamburg, Germany
|
Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 4:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Can we have an official statement of Steinberg that opening e.g. a single audio track needs around 3MB of RAM? _________________ Alex Pfeffer
website · facebook · twitter |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Georg Bruns Administrative Moderator
Joined: 28 Jun 2006 Posts: 995
|
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 10:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
The RAM usage per channel is not an issue that needs to be officially commented.
If you worry about your RAM resources please take a look at the according monitor of your system (Mac: Applications > Utilities > Activity Monitor, PC: Task Manager). _________________ www.steinberg.net |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Waywyn Member
Joined: 31 Jan 2005 Posts: 371 Location: Hamburg, Germany
|
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 11:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Georg Bruns wrote: | The RAM usage per channel is not an issue that needs to be officially commented.
If you worry about your RAM resources please take a look at the according monitor of your system (Mac: Applications > Utilities > Activity Monitor, PC: Task Manager). |
Hi Georg,
like I mentioned somewhere else here, it SHOULD be officially announced that it just needs so much more RAM (up to 5 times more than before). The RAM usage on tracks is so heavy that it takes around 300 MB more on my template I am using.
And I ask again, what is the reason in stating that a lot of stuff has been optimized (vst3 etc.) and needs less RAM if hosting tracks in general needs up to 5 times more RAM than in SX3. With this being said, C4 is NOT more efficient than SX3 was because it needs mmuch more RAM.
It is simple:
If I read: Program needs less RAM - my head goes: "Cool, program needs less RAM, so I can work more effienct
But when I received the program - my head was like this: "Wow, C4 needs more RAM than SX3. Where is it efficient then?"
Like I said before, if it would be already available for Unversal Binary. I would laugh about these 500 MB wasted, but currently I have 2GB in my PC, running a template with 70 group and 230 midi tracks. I can run it in SX3 but NOT in C4.
So please, where it has been optimized in RAM usage?? I am asking this without bashing and ranting. I am just angry that I spent money on a program which I am not able to use - at least for my orchestral stuff.
The most ironic thing is, that I have Steinberg True Strike player installed on my main machine and I need the percussion samples for my stuff.
Yes, I could easily deinstall it, put the dongle key in one of my slaves and install it there in order to free more RAM on my main machine.
But this would also mean that I wouldn't be able to run any old songs and would need a lot of time to reconfigure tracks and all that stuff. If the Halion3 content would be free to encrypt like nearly ever other sample format is able to do, I would have no problems at all ... I could extract the stuff I need for Kontakt 2 and put it on my slave real quick, but ironically two Steinberg products prevent each other from running in an efficient way together. _________________ Alex Pfeffer
website · facebook · twitter |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Georg Bruns Administrative Moderator
Joined: 28 Jun 2006 Posts: 995
|
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 1:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Now I see your point!
At first: Can you tell me where you've read that C4 does need less RAM?
This indeed would be a wrong information.
I've done some testing and can confirm that C4 needs more RAM per track than SX 3.
Depending on the platform, project and track class I experienced that C4 consumed ca. 2.5 - 3.5 MB/track while SX 3 is content with 1.7 - 2.5 MB/track.
So in extreme cases C4 may ask for twice as much RAM. But I couldn't reproduce a ratio of 5:1 like you've stated.
I'v got to admit that I didn't take such a close look at the differences in RAM usage before. But the results did not surpise me at all.
Cubase 4 got a lot of new features, particularly features that are track related (e.g. customizability). VST3 also offers more possibilities for each track.
More features, more options, more code. That needs more RAM even if the exisitng code might be optimized.
I cannot remember that there ever has been a Cubase update that asked for less RAM than its predecessor - this is even valid for almost all applications.
Nevertheless I'll see if I can get some background information. _________________ www.steinberg.net |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Waywyn Member
Joined: 31 Jan 2005 Posts: 371 Location: Hamburg, Germany
|
Posted: Wed Oct 11, 2006 1:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks Georg,
actually I have to admit that I had the "silent mode" feature in mind and it saves RAM, but it's not actually stated somewhere that it needs less RAM in general. Sorry about that
The only thing which bugs me, is that it's getting really narrow when working with big project files on a 2GB PC.
I also know that previous versions in general use less RAM and CPU than the newer releases, no need to discuss that, but it was just terrifying to see that it did such a big jump in RAM consume. Usually I am not impressed if Amp simulation software is released and almost takes about 30% of CPU in high quality mode while the previous version used around 5% - no problem, but a sequencer just needs so much more RAM and that I couldn't go on working with it, was just a bit shocking.
In this case I either have to buy more RAM or getting a 4th slave PC and hope that the crossover version of True Strike for Kontakt2 will be release soon to get rid of that .. sorry... crappy Halion player. This thing really shakes my PC. (While I handle lots of tracks with Kontakts on one PC I simply need to play 2-4 instruments really fast with Halion player and my whole PC starts stuttering and almost crashing because of the weird DFD of Halion. Sorry but that's another topic
So all in all the update on C4 gets a little bit more expensive rather than just paying the upgrad itself  _________________ Alex Pfeffer
website · facebook · twitter |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Patanjali Sokaris Guest
|
Posted: Sat Nov 11, 2006 10:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
I get the feeling that the SL/SE, etc lines are delayed in the hope that existing users upgrade to the top-of-the-line rather than stay at the same level. In other words, it is a strategic marketing and economic ploy, rather than a technicaL one.
After all, if Cubase was appropriately architected, flicking a few compile-time switches would be all that is required to build simultaneous releases for all product levels and all platforms. As a side benefit, the Software development Lifecycle would be more streamlined, with better synching and versioning between product and component module levels. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Roel Member
Joined: 17 Mar 2006 Posts: 121
|
Posted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 7:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I disagree with item 3 CPU usage.
Cubase SX is idling at 10-15% whereas Cubase 4 is idling at 15-25%.
With idling I mean doing ABSOLUTELY nothing! _________________ Intel Quad-Core Q8200 2.33GHz, 8G RAM, 2x 250G Sata, 2x 1T Sata, Vista 64bit, Cubase 5, Vocaloid Miriam, Wusikstation 5, Manyguitar, CM plugins, EWQL Gold |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sonicboomboy New Member
Joined: 17 Nov 2006 Posts: 14 Location: Devon, UK
|
Posted: Sat Nov 25, 2006 7:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hi, can someone point me to the 'known issues' thread?
Surely there should be a 'sticky' for known issues, otherwise known as the 'Steinberg ToDoImmedietly' list ?! _________________ www.flitemedia.com |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Roel Member
Joined: 17 Mar 2006 Posts: 121
|
Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2006 6:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Try this:
ftp://ftp.steinberg.net/Download/Cubase_4/4.0.1.2074/C4_CS4_4.0.1_Version_History_Issues_Solutions.pdf _________________ Intel Quad-Core Q8200 2.33GHz, 8G RAM, 2x 250G Sata, 2x 1T Sata, Vista 64bit, Cubase 5, Vocaloid Miriam, Wusikstation 5, Manyguitar, CM plugins, EWQL Gold |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dustybottoms New Member
Joined: 06 Dec 2006 Posts: 8
|
Posted: Thu Dec 07, 2006 9:29 pm Post subject: HalionOne upgradeable |
|
|
I just bought cubase studio 4 containing the HalionOne plugin. Is it possible to use an update from Halion 1 to Halion 3.1. (about 80€) or are these two different plugins (Is there a difference between "Halion Player" and "Halion", an is there a difference between "HalionOne" and "Halion 1"). Sorry, I'm pretty new with cubase and I'm looking for a way to load samples (wav etc.) an do keyboard mapping. What do I do?
Thanks for reply,
Micha
(Bremen, Germany) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Georg Bruns Administrative Moderator
Joined: 28 Jun 2006 Posts: 995
|
Posted: Fri Dec 08, 2006 1:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
HALion 1-3 are the original versions of Steinberg's VST sampler.
HALion Player is the "playback only" version. It comes with the same sound library as HALion but does not allow to create own sample programs.
HALionOne is a special playback only version of HALion which is included in Cubase 4 and Cubase Studio 4. It has an own sound library that is based on waveforms from Yamaha's Motif.
Since HALionOne and HALion 1 are two different pairs of shoes there's no upgrade path from HALionOne to HALion 3.
Cheers,
Georg _________________ www.steinberg.net |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
swiharta Member
Joined: 12 Jan 2005 Posts: 266
|
Posted: Tue Dec 26, 2006 7:15 pm Post subject: how dumb |
|
|
| Quote: | | HALionOne and HALion 1 are two different pairs of shoes there's no upgrade path from HALionOne to HALion 3 |
Different? I'll say. Confusing? Most definitely. HalionOne is a stupid name for a product that is not a sampler nor shares anything in common with Halion; it should really be called MotifOne (if you insist on putting "One" in the title). I guess that would be risky if Yamaha decides to sell off Steinberg though, eh? _________________ Music - The Andrew Swihart Collection |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Aspyrant Junior Member
Joined: 27 Oct 2007 Posts: 31
|
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 4:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
you're right swiharta I'm confused too! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
anuthagreenworld Member
Joined: 11 Jun 2007 Posts: 104
|
Posted: Tue Mar 04, 2008 4:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I notice a small difference in load between SE3 and CS4.1 on a much slower machine than any listed here. Up to 8% maybe. More RAM, yes definitely, less than 2GB is no good at all unless you plan not to use Mediabay/Soundframe. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Jpu4ea New Member
Joined: 26 Jun 2008 Posts: 13 Location: Bournemouth England
|
Posted: Wed Jul 02, 2008 1:35 am Post subject: Bounce n Add !!!! |
|
|
http://www.mp3unsigned.com/showmp3.asp?mp3id=54261 Hmmm seems some of you are not remembering the Days of Old ...Bouncin&Addin.... .... lol DJ_Dence/JPU4ea  _________________ AMD 2.2 Home_Xp.Cubase Studio 4/Logic 5/Fruity7/Reason4/Vsti_Tek:-) Cs2X Yamaha Behringer_Truths. . . |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
mansh Junior Member
Joined: 11 Nov 2008 Posts: 28
|
Posted: Tue Nov 11, 2008 6:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Hi I'm confused with all the Halions as well: Now, I have Cubase LE and want to know if I should upgrade to Essential 4, with HalionOne built in, or if I should buy Halion Player - what has the best sounds? I'm after drums, bass, pianos, organs, brass and some strings. I don't need loads of 'programability', just the most realistic natural sounds. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chris Beuermann Administrative Moderator
Joined: 11 May 2005 Posts: 6658 Location: Steinberg HQ, Hamburg, Germany
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
sodacide New Member
Joined: 15 Oct 2008 Posts: 1
|
Posted: Sat Nov 29, 2008 3:31 pm Post subject: Cubase SX3 & Cubase 4 |
|
|
hey all..
hope to get answers to these:
1. i'm wondering, how and where can i buy a new Cubase SX3? Is it already discontinued?
2. i'm using Cubase Essential 4. if i want to upgrade to Cubase 4, i just buy the Cubase 4 upgrade pack, am i right?? Just want to be sure bout this one before buyin'.
thanx.. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Georg Bruns Administrative Moderator
Joined: 28 Jun 2006 Posts: 995
|
Posted: Fri Dec 05, 2008 11:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
1. SX 3 has been discontinued 2 years ago.
2. Your are absolutely right. There is a upgrade offer from every Cubase version to all versions above.
Cheers,
Georg _________________ www.steinberg.net |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|